Aurora Colorado Shootings by Young Progressive Democrat
Here We Go Again!
By Scott Rohter, July 2012
Here we go again. We are getting used to it by now. Another senseless act of violence committed by a youth with a firearm. And another mindless attempt to limit the rights of Americans to own handguns. One more in a long chain of attempts to “infringe” upon “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” We are getting used to these incessant attempts to limit our Constitutional Rights as well.
There was another random attack over the weekend by an irreligious, gun toting and obviously disturbed youth (probably a deranged Democrat with connections to Occupy Wall Street, San Diego). The mass shooting was perpetrated in a darkened Colorado movie theatre where patrons of the establishment had come to view the premier showing of a Hollywood blockbuster Movie, Batman the Dark Knight. The assailant broke in through the exit doors, and he began firing almost immediately into the crowd of seated moviegoers. Obviously no one else thought to carry their own personal firearm into the theatre with them. They probably thought they were safe! Who would have suspected that they would need to exercise their legitimate right to bear arms or concealed carry on this particular Friday evening? Perhaps many of them had already been brainwashed into believing that all guns are bad, and voluntarily surrendered their right to keep and bear arms in their own minds many years ago!
Whatever the case, there was inadequate security at the theatre. The owners of the movie house were insured of course, but the insurance company obviously did not require sufficient security measures that might have prevented someone from busting in through the exit doors before they could be stopped. The owner of the theatre was just in business to show a Hollywood movie and take the public’s money of course, and to make a profit if he could, and that as we all know is the most important thing for any business… to make a profit.
So why is the media blaming guns again for this crime against life? They didn’t shoot all by themselves did they? It took someone to squeeze the trigger didn’t it? It took someone else to plant the suggestion into the murderers head didn’t it? But the lib media always tries to blame the guns for the crime! Why not blame the insurance company for not requiring stricter security measures be implemented before writing a commercial policy for a public place where so many people are gathered together into such a small space? Why not blame the City of Aurora or the State of Colorado for not requiring stricter security measures before they issue a permit to operate such a business, or renew their annual business license? Why blame the manufacturer of firearms?
Why not blame the deranged boy’s parents for not doing a better job of raising their son. Why not hold them responsible for the miserable job they did nurturing this young monster? Why didn’t they report their son’s abnormal behavior to the proper authorities? But instead the Lib Media always blames the guns and the gun manufacturers! It is always the weapons manufacturer that the Democrats and their European Socialist counterparts seek to go after. Why is that?
Why not blame the culture that the young sociopath grew up in, which elevates violence in both music and film, on both the big screen, and the TV? That’s a very pregnant question. Why? Why do you think? Why not put the blame squarely where it belongs? Why not blame Hollywood, the major networks and the broadcast industry for their complicit role in providing the viewing audience with such “fine cultural role models” and such “uplifting family entertainment”? Talk about the Dark Knight. Let’s talk instead about the darkside!”
Why not blame Hollywood which produces and profits from both movies and television shows that glorify violence? It is after all the liberal corporate news divisions which are either owned by Hollywood interests or the national broadcasting and entertainment networks, or in cahoots with them, that are always screaming the loudest for gun control. Me Thinkest they protesteth too much! (much too much!) Are they clamoring so loud for infringements on our 2nd Amendment Rights just in order to divert attention from their own corporate business models which promote and purvey such corrupting violence on film and television? What do you think?
All of the corporate news divisions of the national broadcasting companies are literally scrambling now over the dead and injured bodies of the victims of Aurora, Colorado in order to broadcast the horrific images and position themselves better to re-open the discussion about gun control in America! “He had 6,000 rounds of ammunition. He had high powered assault weapons. He purchased everything legally, or on line. What can we do to prevent incidents like this from happening in the future?” These were just some of the comments taken from National Public Radio this weekend. “We have to do something”, said a guest on NBC’s ‘Meet the Damn Press’. “Do we focus on guns, or do we focus on individuals”, another voice asked?
I have a novel idea. Why don’t we focus on the broadcast networks themselves that are corrupting our youth, who own the corporate news divisions and glorify and promote this kind of violence in the public’s mind through their entertainment divisions? Occasionally they reach a troubled individual, some socially deviant numskull with all of their "Hollyweird" garbage and they lay the groundwork for these kind of atrocities to occur in our society.
Along with that novel approach, I have another great idea. Why DON’T we focus for just a minute on the individual assailant in this Colorado massacre? James Holmes is probably an angry disenchanted Democrat. Does he look like a Republican or a conservative to you with his long hair all dyed red the way that it is? He might have been a member of Occupy Wall Street, San Diego. Apparently the Democrats aren’t moving fast enough with all of their plans to destroy whats left of our nation's free market economic system to please all of their Party’s disgruntled Socialists and sociopaths! I bet James Holmes read the same Socialist propaganda in college that President Obama read in his youth….all of the usual nonsense from Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers, and others. I have an idea. Why don’t we just prevent Democrats from owning firearms instead of trying to take guns out of the hands of law abiding Republicans and conservatives and other citizens so they can’t defend themselves? Why don’t we take guns and ammunition out of the hands of ignorant, idealistic members of Occupy Wall Street and other disgruntled Socialist-progressives and keep any of these types from ever being elected to Congress or the White House in the future? Oh I guess that would eliminate President Obama wouldn’t it? Darn it!
The other day one of those pompous Socialist-progressives from England on the B.B.C. with a degree in journalism from Oxford no doubt, was opining on their State owned radio that, “Americans have a profound misunderstanding of our own Second Amendment.” This royal Pommie subject of the British crown determined that he knew better what our Second Amendment meant than we do, or our own Nation’s Founding Fathers did! Perhaps our Founders meant to say something other than what they actually penned down when they wrote, “The Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed!” (extra punctuation added) He went on to say, “What makes you Americans think that you as individuals have a right to bear arms?” Isn’t it just like one of those “cocky Pommie sops” from the B.B.C. to try to tell us what our own Constitution means?
I think it is characteristic of all Socialists and all Socialist governments everywhere, all across the world to try to prevent their people from owning the means wherewith they can defend themselves. Socialists have a profound desire to make sure that guns cannot be sold in their countries, whether they are to citizens, or to subjects, or to just plain victims of their own State tyranny. Do the subjects of the British Crown have the right to own guns? Do the citizen subjects of the British Commonwealth in Canada, or Australia, or New Zealand or in any other member nation of the Commonwealth? What about in France? Can citizens of Thoreau’s ‘Socialist’ Republic of France possess firearms? Not likely! What about in the “hard core” Socialist countries like Russia, China, or Cuba, or Venezuala? What is the likelihood that people in those countries can have free and unfettered access to the firearms that they need to defend themselves? If the people of Norway would have been able to easily access personal firearms for self protection then it is highly unlikely that young Anders Breivik could have taken the lives of so many little children of the members of the Norwegian Parliament at their summer camp on Utoya Island last year.
What do all of these countries have in common? They are all Socialist societies with liberal Socialist Labor governments, based on Marxian ideology! Now watch in America as the liberal progressives and the mainstream media Network Broadcast Companies through their corporate news divisions try to position themselves to use this latest unfortunate incident in Colorado to re-open the discussion in America over gun control. And it comes right at the same time that the United Nations Treaty on Arms Control is the subject of Congressional debate in the U.S. Senate. – Just all a big coincidence I am sure!
Original News Sources
Note : A Comment posted to and taken from the previous link above
ABC News has issued a formal apology and clarification of an earlier report that incorrectly stated that a Jim Holmes of a Colorado Tea Party organization might be the suspect in the fatal shootings at a Aurora, Colo., movie theater early Friday morning.
"ABC News and Brian Ross apologize for the mistake, and for disseminating that information before it was properly vetted," the network said in a correction posted to its website.
As speculation mounts about the motive behind the mass shooting, one private investigator has said that Holmes may have been part of Occupy Wall Street’s most violent faction, Occupy Black Bloc.
Bill Warner told how the Batman movie portrays the OWS crowd in a negative vein, leading him to believe that may have been a cause behind the gunman’s rage.”
"A journalist has no better friend than the truth." - Scott Rohter